A new California bill would seek to eliminate ultra-transformed foods deemed “particularly harmful” to the physical and mental health of school lunches by 2032, creating the first legal definition of ultra-grey food in the United States and state scientists in Tâte and experts from the University of California to determine the most risk of the state.
The bill is the first of its kind and marks a growing level of control of ultra-greater food by the government, which currently have no legal or scientific definition, but are widely understood to refer to industrially produced foods and which contain additives such as artificial flavors, emulsifiers, conservatives and synthetic dyes.
“Americans are among the largest global consumers of ultra-adjustment food, and we pay the price, both in terms of declining health and our rapidly increasing health care costs,” said California member AssemblyMyme Jesse Gabriel, who is the author of the invoice, at a press conference on Wednesday. Gabriel has also written the two recent laws on recent state food security, which have prohibited four additives from all foods sold in California as well as the prohibition of a certain number of synthetic dyes of school meals.
The proposal comes in the midst of a wave of state legislation in the United States to prohibit certain food additives and coloring, as well as the increase in public debate on the potential dangers of ultra-grease food, which, according to some research, can be addictive and linked to chronic disease problems such as cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. That said, there is currently no scientific consensus Ultra-transformed, and healthy foods and whole grain bread can also be in this category.
Although it is only the introduction of the bill, it has bipartite support, said Gabriel. California has acquired a main strength reputation on food and nutritional problems, Governor Gavin Newsom issuing an executive decree studying the health effects of ultra-transformed food earlier this year. A failed Massachusetts bill also attempted to limit the quantity of ultra-transformed foods that could be served in schools.
This decision indicates how the States come into a perceived vacuum left by the federal government. The Food and Drug Administration, which regulates food additives, has faced frequent criticism to allow food industries and drinks to present ingredients without sufficient examination via a legal escape. And some champions of nutrition reform have been disappointed to learn that US food guidelines will not be addressed to ultra-adjustment foods because an expert advisory committee said there was not yet enough evidence to shape their advice.
Sorting the more than 10,000 chemicals in the American food supply to determine what health risks resemble a noble order, in particular at a time when the Trump administration is threatening and, in some cases, the reduction in the financing of university research. But Gabriel said he hoped that the state would avoid these cuts and added that scientists already had a lot of evidence on which additives can be harmful. “It’s not like we are going to ask our state scientists to start zero.”
Barry Popkin, professor of nutrition at UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, said that “the simplest option” would be to prohibit foods with artificial colors or flavors. This would cover 98% of ultra-transformed foods, according to his research.
The Consumer Brands Association, which represents the manufacturers of packaged food, did not immediately respond to a request for comments.
Nutrition research has tended to focus on the risks associated with unique ingredients like Sugar, Michael Goran, professor of pediatrics at the Keck School of Medicine of the South California, during the press conference. But people do not consume single nutrients, they consume whole meals. He praised the proposal to combat “the overall health of school meals in a holistic manner”.
“School nutrition can seriously compromise healthy development,” he said. “Schools can and should be better partners with parents and caregivers looking to support healthier nutrition at home.”
Coverage of chronic health problems by stat is supported by a subsidy of Bloomberg philanthropies. OUR financial supporters are not involved in any decision concerning our journalism.
